Howdy! I'm Tristin and I was born in 2001 in San Diego a Lao family, who have influenced me greatly. Since elementary school, I have taken interest in music and architecture, music of which my dad influenced. I also enjoy Lao food, which my mom influenced. I have not changed much since then, as I am still pursuing a career in both fields. Now, though, I have expanded my horizons. I now enjoy watching movies, particularly Asian films (like Wong Kar-Wai, and Studio Ghibli).
Monday, November 6, 2017
Socratic Seminar #2: Black Elk (question 3)
Throughout the entire chapter, many ideas and concepts are motifs are repeated as motifs, perhaps emphasizing the importance of them. Among repeated ideas are the Black Road, which "goes from where the thunder beings live (the west) to where the sun continually shines (the east), a fearful road . . . of troubles and war". The recurring Black Road is important because this is the road the Black Elk "travels" on and explains a lot about the impending events of the Sioux nation. Another recurring concept are the horses, which "went into formation, four abreast". The horses serve as a sort of guide for Black Elk, and are emphasized and heavily described in the first two pages with black horses that have "necklaces with bison hoofs" or white horses with manes "flowing like a blizzard wind". I assume Black Elk uses these recurring themes and heavy description a lot to make the reader "experience" the vision along with him. Interestingly, though, considering Native Americans value words and stories, this overuse of words seems strange. This may be due in part by John G. Neihardt, who interpreted and published the vision for Black Elk. This description, so, may not be all of Black Elk's ideas.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I agree, This story has that feeling that you are also experiencing it rather than hearing it as a story that should be viewed in an objective manner. This also could be Black Elk misinforming and fantasizing as well because Lame Deer's account was far shorter and concise. Overall, I do agree that ideas were interpreted wrong and some ideas were fantasized.
ReplyDeleteI agree with your statement when you said that the heavy description makes the reader experience his vision with him rather than just reading about the experience he had. The fact that the story was interpreted by John G. Neihardt could also be a reason on why the story was so long and repetitive.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that because this is interpreted by John G. Neihardt, there are ideas that he added to Black Elk’s vision. Adding many details that Black Elk may have left out because he is native.
ReplyDelete